Gulafsa Begum – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 25.06.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (POCSO Act), No. 12, Sultanpur, passed in Criminal Appeal (Juvenile) No. 19 of 2021, relating to Case Crime No. 360/2017, under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the revisionist that on 17.12.2017 the First Information Report of Case Crime No. 360/2017, under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur, was lodged by the revisionist against the opposite party nos.2 and 3 and other co-accused that the daughter of the revisionist aged about 14 years was raped seven months ago as a result whereof she became pregnant. When the revisionist got information of her daughter's pregnancy they tried to marry her with the opposite party no. 2 but the father of the opposite party no. 2 denied such proposal. The revisionist and her associates told the father of the opposite party no.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.