IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
Sumit Kumar Verma - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy. Dept. Of Medical Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Civil Secrtt. Lko And Others - Respondent
WRIT - A No. - 755 of 2022
Decided On : 15-2-2022
Fraudulent Appointment - Employment under Dying in Harness Rules - The U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 - Rule-5 of The U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying in Harness) (5th Amendment) Rules, 1999
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner obtained employment on a Class-IV post in a university under the Dying in Harness Rules after the death of his father. However, it was found that he had concealed the fact that his mother was already employed in the university at the time of his appointment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's appointment was obtained fraudulently by concealing material facts, and therefore, his appointment was void ab initio.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules was valid, considering the employment status of his mother at the time of his appointment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the legal principle that fraudulent or illegal appointments, even if continued for a long time, cannot be justified and are void ab initio.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the termination of the petitioner's services due to the fraudulent nature of his appointment.
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
1. The petitioner, who obtained employment on Class-IV post in King George's Medical University, Lucknow (for short "the University") under the provisions of The U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 (for short "the Rules, 1974) after death of his father on 13.11.2007, who was working on the post of fireman in Construction Division of the University, has filed this writ petition, impugning the order dated 19.06.2021 passed by the Registrar of the University, terminating his services with immediate effect and the order dated 13.12.2021 passed by the Vice-Chancellor of the University, dismissing appeal of the petitioner filed against the order of termination.
2. A complaint was made against one Mr. Anand Kumar Mishra, Head Assistant, that he had obtained appointment illegally, after concealing material fact and by misrepresentation; Mr. Anand Kumar Mishra was issued charge-sheet as required under rule-5 of The U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying in Harness) (5th Amendment) Rules, 1999; Mr. Anand Kumar Mishra, in his reply to the charge-sheet, had mentioned that like him, other employees were also appointed illegally.
3. In view of the aforesaid allegation, the University decided to examine appointment made on compassionate ground after 2002 and Prof. A.A. Mehndi, Biochemistry Department, was appointed as inquiry officer. In the inquiry conducted by Mr. Mehndi it was found that at the time of appointment of the petitioner on compassionate ground under the Rules, 1999, the petitioner's mother Smt. Kiran was employed as female sick attendant in Pediatric Department of the University. After receiving this report, the petitioner was issued charge-sheet on 05.10.2020 having been approved by the appointing authority
4. Mr. Ram Chandra, Administrative Officer, was nominated as inquiry officer. Thereafter, vide order dated 03.10.2020, Dr. Mhod Kalim Ahmad, Deputy Registrar was nominated as inquiry officer.
5. The petitioner filed his reply to the charge-sheet and, was given opportunity of hearing and the inquiry officer submitted his report on 04.03.2021. The petitioner was issued show-cause-notice along with inquiry report and, after considering his reply to the show-cause-notice, impugned order has been passed.
6. The petitioner admitted that he was appointed on compassionate ground after death of his father and, he did not give details of employment of his parents in the form submitted by him. The petitioner has also admitted that at the time of his appointment, his mother was working as female sick attendant in the Pediatric Department of the University. Along with the writ petition, the form submitted by the petitioner, has also been annexed as Annexure-11. In column-11, while giving details of the dependents of his deceased father, he has mentioned name of his mother Smt. Kiran, aged about 40 years, but he did not give details of occupation nor monthly income of his mother. The petitioner gave details of his two brothers, Amit and Manish without giving details of their occupation.
7. Under the Rules, 1999, which came into force, the appointment under dying in harness can be made only if wife or husband, as the case may be, is not employed in any Central or State Government or in any corporation/organization owned by the Central or State Government and, no member of the family is employed in Central or State Government or corporation/organization owned by Central or State Government. Thus, there is a specific bar for giving appointment under the Rules, 1999, if wife or husband or any family member is employed in the Central or the State Government or in the corporation/organization owned/controlled by the Central/State Government. In the present case, the petitioner's mother was employed in the University itself as female sick attendant in Pediatric Department and, the petitioner deliberately concealed this fact in his application form an
Point of Law : Misconduct literally means wrong conduct or improper conduct. In usual parlance, misconduct means a transgression of some established and definite rule of action, where no discretion i....
Compassionate appointments cannot be cancelled based on non-disclosure of a parent's employment if the applicant was dependent on the deceased and no fraud was committed.
Point of law: If at any stage the appointing authority/disciplinary authority forms an opinion that instead of the proceedings at hand, proceedings for cancellation of appointment are liable to be un....
Compassionate appointments must comply strictly with applicable rules, and delays in application negate claims for such appointments, emphasizing they are exceptions, not rights.
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule of appointment in public services and is designed to prevent destitution in the family of the deceased employee. The exclusion of persons....
Point of law : Provided under Rule 5(1) of the Rules 1974 that member of the family of the deceased could only be given appointment in case a government servant dies during service and the spouse of ....
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule of public employment and is meant to provide minimum relief for meeting immediate hardship to save the bereaved family from sudden financ....
Appointments must be validated through due process; wrongful termination without fair hearing violates Article 311 rights, making the claim for retiree benefits legally enforceable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.