JUDGMENT :

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Despite notice issue to opposite party No. 2, which has been served personally upon him, no one has put in appearance on his behalf nor any counter affidavit has been filed.

3. Sri. Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, Advocate assisted by Sri. Hari Krishna Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri. Vaibhav Aanad, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

4. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he may be permitted to correct the date of the rejection order.

5. Sri. Vaibhav Aanad, learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionist.

6. Learned counsel for the revisionist is directed to correct the date of rejection order in the memo of application.

7. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 01.03.2021 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Allahabad dismissing Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2021 (C.N.R. No. UPAD-01-002208-2021) (Sachin @ Sachin Bhartiya vs. State of U.P.) and affirming the orders dated 20.11.2020 and 15.01.2021 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Prayagraj refusing the bail plea to the revisionist in Case No. 45 of 20