IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.
Radhey Shyam – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies Lucknow – Respondent
Writ C No. 22891 of 2019
Decided On : 16-02-2022
Essential Commodities Act - Fair Price Shop License - Control Order, 2016 - The court discussed the provisions of the Control Order, 2016 and the legal framework for suspension and cancellation of fair price shop licenses. The court highlighted the requirement of a full-fledged inquiry and the opportunity of hearing before suspension or cancellation of the license. The judgment emphasized that the licensee is required to distribute essential commodities strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license and the provisions of the Control Order, 2016. The court also noted that the licensee does not have a fundamental right to the fair price shop license and that the authorities have the discretion to cancel the license if the licensee fails to comply with the terms and conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's fair price shop license was cancelled by the District Supply Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri, following an inquiry that revealed discrepancies in the distribution of essential commodities. The petitioner challenged the cancellation through multiple writ petitions, arguing that the suspension and cancellation orders were not in compliance with the Government Orders and that he was not given a fair opportunity to defend himself.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the cancellation of the fair price shop license was in accordance with the Control Order, 2016 and that the petitioner was not able to produce any evidence in support of his defense. The court emphasized that the licensee is required to strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of the license and the provisions of the Control Order, 2016. The court also highlighted that the licensee does not have a fundamental right to the fair price shop license and that the authorities have the discretion to cancel the license if the licensee fails to comply with the terms and conditions.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the compliance with the Government Orders and the Control Order, 2016 in the suspension and cancellation of the fair price shop license, as well as the petitioner's opportunity to defend himself during the inquiry process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Control Order, 2016 and the legal framework for suspension and cancellation of fair price shop licenses. The court emphasized the requirement of a full-fledged inquiry and the opportunity of hearing before suspension or cancellation of the license. The court also highlighted that the licensee does not have a fundamental right to the fair price shop license and that the authorities have the discretion to cancel the license if the licensee fails to comply with the terms and conditions.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed as the court found that the cancellation of the fair price shop license was in accordance with the Control Order, 2016 and that the petitioner was not able to produce any evidence in support of his defense. The court emphasized that the licensee is required to strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of the license and the provisions of the Control Order, 2016. The court also highlighted that the licensee does not have a fundamental right to the fair price shop license and that the authorities have the discretion to cancel the license if the licensee fails to comply with the terms and conditions.
JUDGMENT :
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 29.7.2019 passed by the Joint Commissioner (Food), Lucknow Division, Lucknow in Appeal No.01512 of 2019, which was preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 27.5.2019 passed by the District Supply Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri cancelling the license of the fair price shop of the petitioner situated in Nagar Panchayat, Dhauraha. District Lakhimpur Kheri. The order dated 27.5.2019 is also impugned in the present writ petition.
2. The petitioner was given the license to run the fair price shop relating to Nagar Panchayat, Dhauraha. The petitioner was required to distribute the scheduled commodities and Kerosene Oil to the card holders (Antyodaya and Patra Grahasti Yojana) regularly at the rate prescribed by the State Government.
3. On 6.4.2019, upon receiving information, local police caught seven bags of wheat being carried away in Nagar Panchayat, Dhauraha for black marketing. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Dhauraha got the inquiry conducted by the Regional Supply Inspector, who made inspection on the same day in presence of Sri Ram Narayan, local resident, Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Dhauraha, Sri Krishna Dutt, another local resident and Sri Suraj Gupta, son of the petitioner.
4. During the inquiry, certain discrepancies were found in the distribution of essential committees in stock register and the details recorded in E-Pos machine for distribution of the food grains. Upon comparing, the details of the food grains received by the petitioner and distributed to the card holders, shortage of 3.27 Quintals of wheat and excess of 1.27 Quintals of rice was found. Statements of 38 Antyodaya and Patra Grahasti Yojana card holders were recorded, who alleged irregularities in distribution of the essential commodities by the petitioner from the fair price shop. An FIR dated 9.4.2019 came to be registered against the petitioner under Section 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act being FIR No.0204 of 2019 after taking approval of the District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri.
5. Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.10652 (MB) of 2019 before this Court challenging the FIR No.0204 of 2019 against him. The said writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 16.4.2019 granting protection to the petitioner in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273.
6. On 19.4.2019, suspension order dated 15.4.2019 suspending the license of the fair price shop of the petitioner passed by the District Supply Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri was served upon the petitioner. The petitioner was issued show cause notice requiring him to submit his explanation within one week along with records relating to the distribution of the essential commodities from the fair price shop. On 30.4.2019 petitioner submitted his explanation to the show cause notice before the District Supply Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri along with relevant records and requested for revocation of the suspension order dated 15.4.2019. He also requested for distribution of the essential commodities and Kerosene Oil to the petitioner's fair price shop.
7. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.14195 (MS) of 2019 assailing the suspension order dated 15.4.2019. During the pendency of the said writ petition, the District Supply Officer, Lakhimpur Kheri cancelled the license of the fair price shop of the petitioner vide order dated 27.5.2019. The aforesaid writ petition was also dismissed vide order dated 28.5.2019 granting liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 27.5.2019 before the appropriate authority.
8. The petitioner, thereafter, filed Writ Petition No.16885 (MS) of 2019 impugning the order dated 27.5.2019. However, the said writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 4.6.2019 with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a statutory appeal under Clause 13(3) of the U.P. Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the licensee of a fair price shop is required to strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of the license and the provisions of the Control ....
A fair price shop license cannot be cancelled without affording a reasonable opportunity to the licensee to defend against the allegations in accordance with the principles of natural justice.
The judgment established that a summary inquiry for the cancellation of a fair price shop license does not require the supply of the inquiry report to the licensee or a detailed hearing, and that the....
The cancellation of a fair-price-shop license is invalid if the authority that conducted the inquiry also decides the merits of the case, violating procedural requirements.
Fair price shop licenses cannot be cancelled without conducting a proper inquiry and adhering to principles of natural justice, including providing a show cause notice and opportunity to respond.
A suspended license under the Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order must have timely cancellation proceedings initiated within 90 days; otherwise, the suspension becomes invalid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for proper enquiry and opportunity of personal hearing as mandated by the Control Order, 2018, and the violation of principles of n....
The court established that fair price shop dealers must be afforded a proper inquiry and opportunity to defend against charges before cancellation of their authorization.
The court established that fair price shop dealers must be afforded a proper inquiry and opportunity to be heard before any cancellation of authorization can occur.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.