SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 129

MANISH KUMAR
Rama Sharan Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sunil Kumar,Baljeet Singh
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, Anoop Kumar Upadhyay

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the impugned summoning order dated 29.07.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First, Gonda in Criminal Complaint No. 16 of 2015 (Jitendra Singh Vs. Ramasharan Pandey & others), Police Station Paraspur, District Gonda as well as against the order dated 04.7.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act) Gonda in Criminal Revision No. 331 of 2015, (Ramasharan Pandey Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another) along with the criminal proceedings of Criminal complaint no. 16 of 2015 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First, Gonda.

3. Shri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent and learned AGA have raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present application under Section 482 against the revisional order which is also under challenge.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the summoning order was passed without application of mind. It is further submitted that by the impugned summoning order all the applicants were summoned unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top