IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Manoj Misra, Sameer Jain, JJ.
Monu Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Capital Cases No. 13 of 2021 Connected With Reference No.10 of 2021
Decided On : 04-03-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 376, 326-A, 354, 354-A, 452 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 7/8 and 5/6 – Appeal against Conviction – Offence of Murder - It was alleged that at about 10 pm, when PW-1 and his wife were away, their daughter (the victim), aged about 14 years, who was with her maternal grandmother (Nani) (PW-2), the accused-appellant, aged 25 years, came to the house and misbehaved with the victim. When victim resisted his actions, the accused set her ablaze - Whether there is any admissible evidence on the basis of which the conviction could be sustained - In this regard, trial court placed reliance on Paper no. 39Ka/1, alleged dying declaration of the deceased and on statement of PW-2 in her statement in chief that because of the incident FIR was lodged against Monu Thakur – Para 42,43.
Finding of the Court: If prosecution chose not to prove the dying declaration, it cannot be said that the prosecution was prevented from leading evidence in that regard, there may be some reasons which the prosecution did not want to disclose - Be that as it may, as we have not been shown any application from victim’s family to recall or call any witness and there is also no complaint brought to our notice with regard to extension of threat, or of coercion, upon witnesses to desist from speaking the truth, we are of considered view that merely because the dying declaration was not proved, the matter does not call for a retrial.
Result: Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Misra, J.
1. This appeal, forwarded by the Senior Superintendent, District Jail, Aligarh, vide letter dated 27.09.2021, on the request of the appellant Monu Thakur, assails the judgment and order of the court of Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (PCOSO Act), First, Hathras, dated 23.09.2021, in Special Sessions Trial No.40 of 2019, convicting the appellant Monu Thakur under Sections 302, 376, 326-A, 354, 354-A, 452 IPC and Sections 7/8 and 5/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short Pocso Act) and sentencing him as follows:
(ii) Under Section 326-A IPC, imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.5,000/- and a default sentence of additional six months S.I.;
(iii) Under Section 376 IPC read with Section 5/6 of Pocso Act, imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.50,000/-and a default sentence of additional six months S.I.;
(iv) Under Section 354 IPC read with Section 7/8 of Pocso Act, five years R.I. with fine of Rs.5,000/-and a default sentence of additional one month S.I.;
(v) Under Section 452 IPC, seven years R.I. with fine of Rs.10,000/- and a default sentence of additional three months S.I.;
(vi) Under Section 354-A IPC, three years R.I. with fine of Rs.3,000/- and a default sentence of additional fifteen days S.I. All sentences to run concurrently.
2. As death penalty was awarded by the court below, a reference has been sent to this Court under Section 366 (1) CrPC for confirmation of death penalty which has given rise to Reference No.10 of 2021.
3. Considering the nature of the crime, we are not disclosing the name of the victim, members of her family as well of the witnesses of that area (locality) and, therefore, wherever required, they have been described by their witness number.
INTRODUCTORY FACTS
4. The prosecution case is based on a written report (Ex. Ka-1) dated 16.04.2019 submitted by PW-1 (the informant -father of the victim) at P.S. Sikandrarao, District Hathras, at 11.57 hours, of which GD entry (Ex. Ka-4) and Chik FIR (Ex. Ka-3) was made/prepared by PW-4. In the FIR, it was alleged that, on 15.04.2019, at about 10 pm, when PW-1 and his wife (not examined) were away, their daughter (the victim), aged about 14 years, who was with her maternal grand mother (Nani) (PW-2), the accused-appellant, aged 25 years, came to the house and misbehaved with the victim. When victim resisted his actions, the accused set her ablaze. On registration of the FIR, PW-4 prepared a letter for medical examination of the victim and got the victim medically examined on 16.04.2019, at 3.25 pm, through a lady constable Sadhna (not examined), of which medical/injury report (Ex. Ka-6) was prepared by Dr. Gufran Ahmed (PW-6) at J.N. Medical College Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. The injury report reflected thermal burns to the extent of 85% on head, neck, part of face, anterior and posterior trunk, upper limb and lower limb, genitalia. Thermal burns were from kerosene oil and were found grievous in nature. The general condition of the patient was noted as critical. In the column concerning Central Nervous System of the patient it was noted conscious and oriented. The internal examination of Genitalia was made by doctor on duty of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department. The remarks in respect thereof were as follows:-
Bhola Singh v. State of Punjab
Gorakh Nath Prasad V. State of Bihar
Shahid Hossain Biswas Vs. State of West Bengal
Retrial can be directed in exceptional circumstances but not merely to enable the prosecutor to lead evidence which he could but has not cared to lead either on account of insufficient appreciation o....
Point of law: Conviction upheld - In the absence of cogent evidence brought on record to prima-facie establish the foundational facts, conviction of the accused cannot be based solely on presumption ....
School certificate determines minor's age preferentially; POCSO conviction upheld on credible victim testimony despite delay, contradictions (unproved), negative medicals; presumption activated post ....
The need for corroboration of evidence, especially in cases involving child witnesses, and the rebuttable nature of the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act.
A dying declaration is admissible without medical certification if the recording officer is personally satisfied with the declarant's mental fitness. Additionally, the production of an original elect....
In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Inconsistencies and contradictions in the prosecution's evidence may affect the relia....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.