SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 223

K.J.THAKER, AJAI TYAGI
Vipin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Bed Kant Mishra
For the Respondent: Vijay Prakash Mishra

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. This appeal, at the behest of the injured-claimant challenges the judgment and award dated 27.10.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Meerut (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Claim Petition No. 1151 of 2014 awarding a sum of Rs.2,30,000/-as compensation with interest at the rate of 7%.

3. We do not burden the judgment with unnecessary facts except the facts needed for computing the compensation as all other issues have attained finality as neither Insurance Company nor the owner has filed any cross-objection and/or appeal. The accident is not in dispute. The issue of negligence decided by the Tribunal is not in dispute. The respondent-Insurance Company has not challenged the liability imposed on them. The only issue to be decided is, the quantum of compensation as the Tribunal very strangely did not grant any amount for future loss of income, actual loss of income though the claimant who was 22 years of age on 29.5.2014.

4. Learned c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top