SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 40

M. R. SHAH, SANJIV KHANNA
Shivdhar Kumar Vashiya – Appellant
Versus
Ranjeet Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Kumar Mihir, AOR

JUDGMENT

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Leave granted.

1a. Office Report dated 20.01.2022 indicates that ‘No one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 3 & 4 – Insurance Companies, though served through registered A.D. post.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.08.2020 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in MAC No. 623/2014, by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal preferred by the claimant and enhanced the compensation to Rs.27,36,541/- only, the original claimant has preferred the present appeal.

3. That in a vehicular accident between the motor cycle driven by the claimant and the trailer bearing registration No. CG/12/D/8188, the claimant suffered grievous injuries. He was taken to CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur and then to Apollo Hospital, Bilaspur. He remained as indoor patient for 45 days. The claimant suffered multiple injuries over his face; lacerated wound on scalp temporal region; lacerated wound on right ear, swelling over right leg suspected fracture. Discharge Summary issued by the Apollo Hospital, Bilaspur reads as under:

    “There was rashes all over the body. Possibility of eption toxicity was there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top