DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Ram Krishna Math – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. The present petition has been filed, impugning the orders dated 29.07.1992 and 20.01.1994 passed by the Prescribed Authority and the Appellate Authority under the provisions of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (for short “the Act 1960”).
2. The Prescribed Authority (Ceiling), Lucknow rejected the objections filed by the petitioners under Section 11(2) of the Act, 1960 against which the appeal got dismissed by the Appellate Authority. The orders passed to the said effect are under challenge in this petition.
3. One Tej Narain Dar was exclusive owner in possession of agricultural land, consisting of several plots in village Katarabakkash, Pargana and Tehsil Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. He became owner and got possession of the said land as a result of partition decree of the year 1976 passed under Section 176 of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act.
4. Parents of Tej Narain Dar, namely, Anand Swaroop Narain Dar and Smt. Mohan Rani Dar had three more sons, namely, Jagdish Narain Dar, Ishwar Narain Dar and Rajendra Narain Dar. It is said that wife of Tej Narain Dar also owned and exclusively possessed agricultural land holding in her nam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.