SUNITA AGARWAL
Anil Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Gupta, the petitioner (in person) and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The Writ-A No. 6055 of 1989 (Anil Kumar Gupta vs. State Of U.P. and other) had been filed against the order dated 25.3.1989 of simplicitor termination of the services of the petitioner. The said writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 12.7.2001.
The office has reported that a restoration application seeking for recall of the order dated 12.7.2001 had been filed in the Registry in the year 2003 but the same could not be traced despite best efforts made by the section concerned. The order sheet does not indicate that the said restoration application had been decided. The office has, therefore, collected the photo copy of the recall application from the office of the then counsel for the petitioner in order to reconstruct the same. The office report dated 22.3.2021 for re-construction of the restoration application is accepted.
The restoration application had been filed with the contention that the case could not be marked by the office of the then counsel for the petitioner and the absence of the counsel was not deliberate. The explanation offered
State of U.P. vs. Ashish Niranjan and another
Kaptan Singh vs. State of U.P. and another
Imperial Tabacco Company of India Ltd. vs. Its Workmen
Roop Singh Negi vs. Punjab National Bank and others
State of Uttar Pradesh and others vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha
Subhash Chandra Sharma vs. U.P. Co-operative Spinning Mills and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.