SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1480

RAJEEV MISRA
Punit Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajiv Lochan Shukla, Abhishek Narayan Pandey
For the Respondent: Mool Chandra Maurya

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for revisionist, Mr. Prashant Kumar, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. P.K. Sahi, learned brief holder for State and Mr. M.C. Maurya, learned counsel for opposite party 2.

2. Perused the record.

3. This criminal revision has been filed challenging order dated 15.2.2021, passed by Second Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kasganj, in Sessions Trial No. 329 of 2018 (State Vs. Vineet Yadav and Others), under sections 307, 427, 506 and 325 IPC, Police Station-Sidhpura, District Kasganj, arising out of Case Crime No. 150 of 2018, under sections 307, 427, 506 and 325 IPC, Police Station-Sidhpura, District Kasganj, whereby application under section 319 Cr.P.C. filed by first informant/opposite party-2 Rajesh Kumar has been allowed. Consequently, applicant has been summoned to face trial in above mentioned case.

4. Record shows that in respect of an incident, which is alleged to have occurred on 5.7.2018, first informant/opposite party-2 Rajesh Kumar lodged a prompt F.I.R. dated 5.7.2018, which was registered as Case Crime No. 0150 of 2018 under sections 307, 427, 506 IPC, P.S. Sidhpura, District Kasganj. In the aforesaid F.I.R., as


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top