L.NAGESWARA RAO, M.R.SHAH
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. R. Shah, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 19.12.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Revision – CRR No. 521 of 2018 by which the High Court has dismissed the said revision petition preferred by the appellants herein and has confirmed the order dated 28.10.2017 passed by the learned Trial Court, by which the appellants herein were summoned to face the trial for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 302, 307 and 506 of the IPC, the appellants herein have preferred the present appeal.
3. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:
That one Hukum Singh lodged one FIR No. 180 on 12.06.2016 at Police Station Sadar, Panipat against ten accused, including the appellants herein for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 302, 307 and 506 of the IPC. It was alleged that on 12.06.2016 at about 1.30 pm, he along with his son Bhajji and Hari son of Parkash were going from Panipat to his village Chhajpur Khurd on his tractor. His son had parked his motorcycle in front of the shop of Nande at bus stand. Therefore, his son Bhajji and
Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2014) 3 SCC 92 – Applied [Para 4.2]
Bijendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2017) 7 SCC 706 – Applied [Para 4.5]
Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police (1985) 2 SCC 537 – Applied [Para 5.2]
S. Mohammed Ispahani v. Yogendra Chandak (2017) 16 SCC 226 – Applied [Para 7.9]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.