Razia vs State of U. P. - 2022 Supreme(All) 513

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 513

Razia – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ashok Kumar Srivastava.
For the Respondent: Abdul Jabbar.

JUDGMENT :

KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.

C.M. Application No. 83077 of 2008

1. The application seeks condonation of delay in filing the criminal revision.

2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. None appears for respondent no. 2.

4. Since cause shown in the affidavit filed in support of application for condonation of delay in filing the instant revision is satisfactory, the application for condonation is allowed and delay in filing the instant revision is hereby condoned.

(Order on the memo of Revision)

1. Heard Shri Avinash Srivastava holding brief of Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

2. None appears for respondent no. 2. However, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present revision is pending since 2008 and even objections have not been filed by respondent no. 2 and the matter has never been argued by respondent no. 2.

3. The present revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 11.4.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Pratapgarh passed in Criminal Revision No. 54 of 2007, whereby the order of trial Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document