PANKAJ BHATIA
Ajay Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru Secy. Exice Civil Sectt. Lucnow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 24.02.2016 whereby 06 country liquor and 02 Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) licenses of the petitioner were cancelled and the security as well as the licence fee was forfeited in exercise of powers under Section 34 of The United Provinces Excise Act, 1910 as well as the appellate order dated 22.03.2016 whereby the appeal preferred by the appellant was dismissed and the order dated 17.02.2017 whereby the revision preferred by the petitioner before the State Government was rejected.
3. The facts in brief leading to the filing of the present writ petition are that the petitioner was granted six licences of country liquor shop in District Amethi in exercise of the powers conferred under the Uttar Pradesh Excise (Settlement of Licenses for Retail Sale of Country Liquor) Rules, 2002 (in short 'the Rules 2002') and was also granted two licences for selling foreign liquor in District Amethi in terms of the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Excise [Settlement of Licenses for Retail Sale of Foreign Liquor (Excluding Beer and Wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.