SHAMIM AHMED
Kuldeep – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This case is taken up in the revised call.
2. Heard Ms. Divya Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anirudha Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record.
3. The applicant, Kuldeep, has moved this second bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No.189 of 2016, under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 302 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Achalganj, District Unnao.
4. The first bail application was rejected by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar vide order dated 16.04.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No. 3503 (B) of 2017. This second bail application has been placed before this regular Bench in the light of Hon'ble The Chief Justice's order dated 20.10.2021 as the instant bail application has been released by Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.
5. While rejecting the first bail application on 16.04.2019, a coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to observe as under:
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is falsely implicated in the present case. There was no demand of dowry made by the applic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.