RAJESH BINDAL, SAURABH LAVANIA, AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA I
Ghulam Rasool Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
RAJESH BINDAL, CJ.
1. On a reference made by the learned Single Judge vide order dated August 3, 2018 to a larger Bench and constitution thereof by Hon’ble the Chief Justice, on administrative side, for consideration of the following questions, the matter has been placed before us :
(ii) Whether keeping in view the judgment of Rohit (supra), an aggrieved person will have two remedies available of preferring an appeal under the provisions of Section 14 A of the Act, 1989 as well as a bail application under the provisions of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.?
(iii) Whether an aggrieved person who has not availed of the remedy of an appeal under the provisions of Section 14 A of Act, 1989 can be allowed to approach the High Court by preferring an application under the provisions of Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.?
(iv) What would be the remedy available to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.