RAJESH BINDAL, J. J. MUNIR
State of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Sita Ram – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present intra-Court appeal has been filed by the State impugning the order dated July 30, 2019. Along with the appeal, an application has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing thereof. The period for which the delay is sought to be condoned is not mentioned in the application. However, as calculated by the Registry, it comes to 948 days, i.e., more than two years and seven months.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants, while trying to make out a case for condonation of huge delay of more than two years and seven months in filing the appeal, referred to the affidavit filed in support of the application seeking condonation of delay. He submitted that it was on account of bureaucratic set up and impersonal machinery which resulted in delay in filing the present appeal. One of the reasons is also Covid-19 pandemic. The submission is that the case otherwise is meritorious. The learned Single Judge has allowed the prayer for change of date of birth at the fag end of the career of the respondent-employee which is totally in contravention of judgment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.