VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
State of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Narayan Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Government Appeal No. 2239 of 2009 has been filed by the State-appellant challenging the judgment and order dated 16.09.2008 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Hamirpur in Sessions Trial No. 137 of 2005 arising out of Case Crime No. 22 of 2005 under Sections 302/34, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Rath, District Hamirpur whereby both the accused-respondents have been acquitted of all the charges.
2. The aforesaid judgment and order dated 16.09.2008 has been assailed by the informant of the case Shyam Singh @ Pappu also by filing Criminal Revision No. 3459 of 2008, and by means of an order dated 19-09-2011, the aforesaid Criminal Revision was connected with Govt. Appeal No. 2239 of 2009.
3. Government Appeal No. 2239 of 2009 filed by the State-appellant has been admitted by means of an order dated 04.11.2011.
4. As both the aforesaid cases have been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 16.09.2008, both the cases are being decided by a common judgment.
Prosecution Case
5. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that on 28.01.2005, the informant Shyam Singh @ Pappu gave a written report at Police Station Rath,
Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Vijayee Singh versus State of U.P.
Leela Ram versus State of Haryana
Gangadhar Behera versus State of Orissa (2002) 8 SCC 381
Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India
Pedda Narayana v. State of A.P. [(1975) 4 SCC 153]
Radha Mohan Singh v. State of U.P.[(2006) 2 SCC 450]
Asoke Basak v. State of Maharashtra
Amar Singh v. Balwinder Singh [(2003) 2 SCC 518]
Bhagwan Jagannath Markad v. State of Maharashtra
Bimla Devi v. Rajesh Singh [(2016) 15 SCC 448]
Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor:AIR 1925 PC 1
Chhota Ahirwar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Khujji v. State of M.P.[(1991) 3 SCC 627]
Madhu v. State of Karnataka [(2014) 12 SCC 419]
Manoj Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh
Manjit Singh v. State of Punjab (2013) 12 SCC 746
Ramaswami Ayyangar v. State of T.N. (1976) 3 SCC 779
Rajesh Govind Jagesha v. State of Maharashtra (1999) 8 SCC 428
Guru Dutt Pathak v. State of U.P.
Surendra Chauhan v. State of M.P.
State of Karnataka versus Suvarnamma
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.