SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 813

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
J.J. Munir, J.
Angad Tiwari and Another – Appellants
Versus
National Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Branch Manager and another – Respondents
First Appeal From Order No. 747 of 2013
Decided On : 31-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mukesh Singh
For the Respondent: Deepak Mehrotra, Vikas Pandey

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act - Claimants' Appeal - Section 173 - The judgment discusses the facts of the case, the finding of the court, issues, ratio decidendi, and the final decision. The court analyzed the compensation payable to the claimants and the legal principles governing the determination of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Fact of the Case:

The claimants appealed seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The deceased was involved in a fatal accident, and the claimants sought compensation for his untimely death.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was grossly inadequate and deserved enhancement. It held that the deceased's income should have been determined based on actual earnings and future prospects should have been considered. The court also found that the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal was inadequate and the compensation under the conventional heads needed revision.

Issues: The issues included the determination of the deceased's income, consideration of future prospects, application of the multiplier, and the adequacy of compensation under the conventional heads.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the deceased's income should have been determined based on actual earnings and future prospects should have been considered. It also found that the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal was inadequate and the compensation under the conventional heads needed revision.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, modified the impugned award, and enhanced the compensation to a sum of Rs.5,96,000. The said sum of money shall be payable by the Insurance Company. The claimants shall be entitled to simple interest @ 7% on the sum of compensation awarded from the date of institution of the claim petition until realization.

JUDGMENT :

1. This is a claimants’ appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the Act’) seeking enhancement of the award made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’).

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are these :

On 28.03.2012 at about 02:30 p.m., one Rahul Tiwari was on board a Vikram tempo bearing Registration No. UP-42AT-2014 owned by his father, Angad Tiwari. He was proceeding on board the said vehicle along with some of his friends in a funeral procession from Gonda to Ayodhya. The tempo was moving on the left side of the road towards Ayodhya. As the vehicle reached near village Balapur on the Nawabganj-Katra Road within the local limts of P.S. Nawabganj, District Gonda, Rahul Tiwari met some relatives of his. The tempo was parked on the left hand side of the road and Rahul Tiwari was engaged in a conversation with the relatives. Suddenly, a tanker bearing Registration No. HR38K/0913 came on from the Nawabganj side driven recklessly at a high speed. The tanker hit the tempo and those standing around it, leading to Rahul Tiwari’s death besides that of some others on the spot. Still others from amongst occupants of the Tempo were left injured. The deceased was employed on a vehicle bearing Registration No. UP43T/1057 as a Khalasi, a job that yielded him an income in the sum of Rs. 7000/-per mensem. He further earned a sum of Rs. 3000/-per month from his agricultural pursuits. The deceased Rahul Tiwari, therefore, had a monthly income of Rs. 10,000/-.

3. A First Information Report about the accident was lodged, giving rise to Crime No. 115 of 2012, under Sections 275, 337, 338, 304A and 427 IPC, P.S. Nawabganj, District Gonda. It is on the basis of these facts that the two claimants here, who are the father and the mother of the deceased Rahul Tiwari, instituted a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faizabad. They claimed in compensation for the untimely death of their son, a sum of Rs. 21,60,000/-together with interest. The National Insurance Company Limited, Civil Lines, Faizabad through its Manager were impleaded as opposite party no. 1 to the claim petition, who are respondent no. 1 to this appeal. Smt. Urmila Rungta, who was the owner of the offending vehicle-tanker, was impleaded as opposite party no. 2 to the claim petition and respondent no. 2 to this appeal. Both the Insurance Company and the owner filed their separate written statements. The Insurance Company and the owner both denied the involvement of the offending vehicle. The owner further pleaded that the driver of the offending vehicle, Prahlad had a valid and effective driving licence on the date of accident and the vehicle was insured with respondent-Insurance Company from 14.01.2012 to 13.01.2013. The liability, if any, would, therefore, fall on the shoulders of the Insurance Company.

4. Upon pleadings of parties, the following issues were framed (translated into English from Hindi) :

    (1) Whether on 28.03.2012 at about 02:30 in the day at village Balapur Nawabganj-Katra Road falling under the Police Station Nawabganj, District Gonda when the deceased Rahul Tiwari was proceeding on a Vikram tempo with his friends towards Ayodhya, and had parked the tempo on the left hand side of the road to talk to some relatives, tanker bearing Registration No. HR38K/0913 driven by its driver negligently and at a high speed hit the tempo and its occupants who were standing resulting in the death of Rahul Tiwari and some others?

(2) Whether the driver of the tanker bearing Registration No. HR38K/0913 had a valid driving licence at the time of the accident?

(3) Whether at the time of accident, the tanker bearing Registration No. HR38K/0913 was insured with opposite party no. 1?

(4) Whether the claim petition is bad for non joinder of the owner and the driver of the tempo?

(5) Whether the claimants are

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top