J. J. MUNIR
Urmila Devi Varshney – Appellant
Versus
Garima Varshney – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This recall application has been made on behalf of Smt. Garima Varshney, respondent no. 1 in Matters under Article 227 No. 7723 of 2021, seeking recall of my final order dated 21.01.2022. By the said order, I had directed the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kasganj to decide the pending temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 92 of 2021, Urmila Devi Varshney v. Garima Varshney and others, positively on the next date fixed, after hearing all parties to the suit. It was further ordered that in the event, for some reason, the temporary injunction application cannot be decided on the next date fixed, it shall be disposed of within fifteen days next.
2. Since the said order was passed without issuing notice to the private respondents, which was a course of action adopted because no rights by this Court interpartes were decided, it was thought wise to leave it open to the private respondents, who might feel aggrieved by the said order, to make an application in the decided petition.
3. Now, taking benefit of the opportunity granted, the respondent no. 1 to the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, has made this application, asking for recall of the order da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.