SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 972

AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA-I
Rajendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Tanay Hazari

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants praying inter alia the following reliefs :-

    "a. Issue and order for quashing the Proceedings and Set aside the Bail Cancellation Order dated 01.09.2022 under the Sessions Trial No. 812/2021 in re: State of U.P. v. Ram Bachan and Ors delivered by the Ld. Sessions Judge annexed as Annexure No. 1.

b. Issue an order directing the Police to release the Applicants from Judicial Custody on Bail."

3. In view of the order which is proposed to be passed today, notice to opposite party No.2 is hereby dispensed with.

4. From the pleadings, it transpires that the applicants were granted bail vide order dated 22.11.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Raebareli in Bail Application No.2638 of 2021 arising out of Sessions Trial No.812 of 2021 (State vs. Ram Bachan and others).

5. The learned trial court was informed that the witnesses and the complainant of the aforesaid Sessions Trial No.812 of 2021 are being threatened of dire consequences by the applicants herein. The aforesaid Sessions Trial No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top