JUDGMENT :

1. Despite service of notice upon opposite party no.2, nobody appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2.

2. Heard Sri N.K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Arvind Kumar, learned AGA for the State.

3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the Complaint Case No. 2439 of 2012 dated 05.07.2011 under Sections 420, 468, 471, 506, 120B IPC pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad as well as summoning order dated 19.09.2012 and order dated 03.11.2015 passed by revisional court in Criminal Revision No. 308 of 2012.

4. The necessary facts of the case for the purpose of present application is that opposite party no.2, the complainant on 05.07.2011 filed impugned criminal complaint against the applicants and Raj Bahadur Singh (not applicant), the father of applicant no.1 with the allegation that opposite party no.2 is the son-in-law of Vijay Bahadur Singh, the brother of Raj Bahadur Singh (not applicant) and his marriage was performed with the youngest daughter of Vijay Bahadur Singh. It is further alleged in the complaint that Raj Bahadur Singh (not applicant) with intention to grab