Back
MANOJ MISRA, SYED AFTAB HUSAIN RIZVI
Prempal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of case background and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. testimony regarding abduction and ransom demand (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. witness credibility and evidential discrepancies (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. arguments for conviction and explanation of motive (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. court’s analysis and reasonable doubt on prosecution (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. final judgment and acquittal of appellants (Para 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is against the judgment and order dated 04.03.2016 passed by the Special Judge (Dacoity Affected Areas)/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Farrukhabad in S.S.T. No.37 of 2015 (arising out of case crime no.553 of 2014, P.S. Kayamganj, district Farrukhabad) connected with (i) S.T. No.135 of 2015 (arising out of Case Crime No.562 of 2014, P.S. Kayamganj, district Farrukhabad); (ii) S.T. 136 of 2015 (arising out of Case Crime No.563 of 2014, P.S. Kayamganj, district Farrukhabad); and (iii) S.T. No.137 of 2015 (arising out of Case Crime No.565 of 2014, P.S. Kayamganj, district Farrukhabad), whereby the appellants Prem Pal, Sipahi Lal and Omveer have been convicted under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
