SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1394

Pawan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Singh, Amrendra Nath Rai, Manoj Kumar Srivastava, Pradeep Saxena, Sandeep Kumar Rai, Shams Uz Zaman

JUDGMENT :

Ajai Tyagi, J.

1. The appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Pawan against the judgment and order dated 15.07.2014, passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.12, Bareilly in Session Trial No. 756 of 2012, arising out of Case Crime No. 537 of 2012, under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 302 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly whereby the appellant-Pawan is convicted and sentenced for the offence under Sections 304-B I.P.C. for life imprisonment.

2. The second appeal has been preferred by the appellants namely, Smt. Meera Devi, Kapil and Km. Mona Mala against the judgment and order dated 15.07.2014 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.12, Bareilly in Session Trial No.932 of 2013, arising out of Case Crime No.537 of 2012, under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 302 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Baradari, District Bareilly, whereby the accused-appellants, Smt. Meera Devi, Kapil and Km. Mona Mala are convicted and sentenced for the offence of under Section 498-A I.P.C. for two years imprisonment

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top