IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Arvind Kumar Mishra-I, Mayank Kumar Jain, JJ.
Girish Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 3098 of 1984
Decided On : 02-09-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 313, 161 - Criminal jurisprudence - Offence of murder - Criminal Appeal - Examination of witnesses by police – By way of instant criminal appeal, challenge has been made to validity and sustainability of the judgment and order of conviction passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge, in Session Trial, State, arising out of Case Crime, under Section 302 I.P.C., Police Station, District whereby appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment - Held, Court may record our satisfaction that arguments extended on behalf of present appellants carry force and same are approved and sustained by us - Consequently court hold in unambiguous term that prosecution has not been able to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt against appellant - Thus charge framed against him become doubtful and he is entitled to benefit of doubt - Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of instant criminal appeal, challenge has been made to the validity and sustainability of the judgment and order of conviction dated 31.10.1984 passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge, Ghazipur, in Session Trial No.37 of 1984, State Vs. Girish Singh, arising out of Case Crime No.76 of 1983, under Section 302 I.P.C., Police Station-Khanpur, District-Ghazipur whereby the appellant Girish Singh has been sentenced to life imprisonment.
2. Heard Mr. Rajrshi Gupta, Mr. Rahul Yadav and Jai Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Alok Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Sunil Kumar Tripathi and Mr. M.P. Singh Gaur, A.G.As. for the State and perused the record.
3. The prosecution story as unfolded through the record reflects that one Rani Devi wife of late Jainath Singh, resident of Village Nayakdih, Police Station Khanpur, District Ghazipur, lodged the written report at Police Station Khanpur on 19.06.1983 at 7:45 a.m. regarding some incident that took place yesterday night at 11:45 p.m. in village Nayakdih which was 9 kms. away from the police station Khanpur, with the description that the informant is the resident of within Police Station Khanpur. Her nephew Ramagya Singh son of Dashrath Singh was not having any issue and had given his landed property to the son of his uncle, Ujagir Singh, Shriraj Singh, Giriraj Singh by way of the Will. It so happened that for the last one year, there was some dispute with Shriraj Singh, therefore, the deceased Ramagya Singh began to reside with the son of his uncle, Jairaj Singh. Some property was sold out by the deceased and the sale consideration was given to Jairaj Singh due to which the accused were inimical with the deceased.
4. It so happened that on 18.06.1983 in the night, the deceased Ramagya Singh was sleeping on the cot in front of the door of Bhagwati. It was around 11:30 p.m. when Girish Singh came to the house of the informant and asked whereabouts of Jairaj Singh whereupon she told that Jairaj singh has gone to attend marriage ceremony. Upon this, the accused said that he will kill Ramagya Singh today and he will see as to how he sold out his land. He went away from there. As soon as Girish Singh left her home, she raised alarm whereupon Rama Shanker Singh from her neighbourhood got up and intercepted the accused by saying that have you become mad, whereupon Girish Singh went away from the scene and saying that he proceeded on to take tobacco (Surti) and proceeded towards tubewell where the informant along with Rama Shanker Singh arrived. Thereafter, they rested in front of their houses.
5. It was around 11:45 p.m., the appellant possessing lance (Ballam) proceeded towards Rama Shanker Singh where he was sleeping and threatened him that in case he got up, he will be killed. Thereafter, the appellant proceeded towards house of Ramagya whereupon Rama Shanker Singh raised alarm then Kripa Shanker Singh and others rushed to the spot lightening torches in their hands. At that point of time, the appellant assaulted Ramagya Singh on his stomach with lance (Ballam). Ramagya Singh shouted that he will be killed. Thereafter, Kripa Shanker Singh, Rama Shanker Singh and the informant reached near Ramagya Singh. They saw lance (Ballam) being extracted by the appellant Girish Singh from the stomach (of deceased) in the torch light. Upon seeing the informant and others, the appellant fled away from the scene. Thereafter, lance (Ballam) was taken out of stomach of Ramagya Singh. No one chased the appellant out of fear. The informant could not come to lodge the first information report in the night. The report was scribed / written in the following morning and the matter was reported as such. The written report is Ext. Ka 1.
6. Contents of the aforesaid information were taken down in the Check FIR on 19.06.1983 at 7:45 a.m. at aforesaid police station at Case Crime No.76 of 1983 under Section 302 I.P.C. Check FIR is Ext. Ka-6. On the basis of entries so made in the
SupremeToday
The court affirmed the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony and a reliable dying declaration, emphasizing the established motive of caste rivalry.
The prosecution must substantiate charges with consistent, reliable evidence; failure to do so results in acquittal.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and significant contradictions in witness statements undermine the credibility of the evidence presented.
The judgment establishes that a conviction cannot be sustained solely on the basis of a dying declaration without corroborative evidence, especially when there are significant inconsistencies in witn....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.