SAMEER JAIN
Karmraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sameer Jain, J.
List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State are present. None present on behalf of opposite party No. 2.
2. Heard Sri Anurag Pathak, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri M.P.S. Gaur, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record of the case.
3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1317 of 2007, under Sections 500, 211, 120B IPC pending before learned Judicial Magistrate (II), Saharanpur.
4. Perusal of the record shows that opposite party No. 2 filed a criminal complaint against applicants on 26.3.2007 in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Court No. 19, Saharanpur with the allegation that he (opposite party No. 2) and applicant No. 1 were posted as guards in sub-prison Roorki and he (opposite party No. 2) lodged a criminal complaint against applicant No. 1 and his family members under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504, 506, 427, 460 IPC, which was finally decided on 13.8.2004 by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Roorki and applicant No. 1 and other accused persons were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.