JUDGMENT :

[Neeraj Tiwari, J.]

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. This Court vide order dated 4.12.2021 directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to inform Sri Pankaj Tyagi and Ms. Archana Tyagi, learned counsel for the caveator in writing that on the next date of listing, case shall be heard in first call irrespective of presence of counsel for the caveator.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, Sri Manu Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner has given notice to Sri Pankaj Tyagi and Ms. Archana Tyagi, who received the same on 6.12.2021, but they are not present, therefore, case be decided on merits. The notice dated 6.12.2021 is taken on record.

3. Present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.10.2011 passed by respondent No. 3 by which licence of fair price shop of the petitioner was cancelled and order dated 12.12.2013 passed by respondent No. 2 by which appeal filed by petitioner has been dismissed affirming the order of the respondent No. 3.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner was running fair price shop. His licence of fair price shop was suspended by res