IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Jayant Banerji, JJ.
M/s. Zasha Electrowaste Recycling Private Limited – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ (Tax) Petition No. 626 of 2022
Decided On : 25-05-2022
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order XIX Rule 3 – Order XIX Rule 9 – Allahabad High Court Rules – Rule 12 of Chapter IV – Learned counsel petitioner – Personal affidavit Additional Director General DGGI, Meerut Zonal Unit, Meerut has been filed today which contains 12 paragraphs and all have been sworn – Court evidence in support statements contained in writ petition, special leave petitions applications and other miscellaneous matters accepted in form of affidavit filed by parties concerned – It is necessary that party stating facts must disclose as to what facts are true to his personal knowledge, information or belief – If statement of fact is based on information source of information must be disclosed in affidavit – Court's order are made against a person or party it is all more necessary that person filing affidavit in this regard must take care to verify facts stated in affidavit strictly in accordance Supreme Court Rules – Application accordingly rejected.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel.
2. Personal affidavit dated 25.2.2022 of Sri Pradyumn Tripathi, Additional Director General, DGGI, Meerut Zonal Unit, Meerut has been filed today, which contains 12 paragraphs and all the 12 paragraphs have been sworn as under:
3. Rule 12 of Chapter IV of the Allahabad High Court Rules provides that how an affidavit shall be sworn by the deponent. For ready reference Rule 12 of Chapter IV of the Allahabad High Court Rules, is reproduced below:
On an interlocutory application when a particular fact is not within the deponent's own knowledge, but is based on his belief or information received from others which he believes to be true, the deponent shall use the expression'' I am informed and verily believe such information to be true'' or words to that effect and shall sufficiently describe for the purpose of identification, the person or persons from whom his information was received.
When any fact is stated on the basis of information derived from a document, full particulars of the document shall be stated and the deponent shall verify that he believes such information to be true.''
4. Order XIX Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and Order XIX Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, as inserted by High Court amendment, are reproduced below:
Matters to which affidavits shall be confined:
(1) Affidavits shall be confined to such facts as the deponent is able of his own knowledge to prove, except on interlocutory applications, on which statements of his belief may be admitted, provided that the grounds thereof are stated.
(2) The costs of every affidavit which shall unnecessarily set forth matters of hearsay or argumentative matter, or copies of or extracts from documents, shall (unless the Court otherwise directs) be paid by the party filing the same.
Order XIX Rule 9
''Except in interlocutory proceedings, affidavits shall strictly be confined to such facts as the declarant is able of his own knowledge to prove. In interlocutory proceedings, when the particular fact is not within the declarant's own knowledge, but is stated from information obtained from others, the declarant shall use the expression ''I am in formed'', and, if such be the case, ''and verily believe it to be true'', and shall state the name and address of, and sufficiently describe for the purposes of identification, the person or persons from whom he received such information. When the application or the opposition thereto rests on facts disclosed in documents or copies of documents produced from any Court of Justice or other source, the declarant shall state what is the source from which they were produced, and his information and belief as to the truth of the facts disclosed in such documents. (22-5-1915).''
5. The aforesaid affidavit dated 25.2.2022 filed by Sri Pradyumn Tripathi, Additional Director General, DGGI, Meerut Zonal Unit, Meerut, does not comply with the requirements of a valid affidavit as provided in Rule 12 of Chapter IV of the Allahabad High Court Rules/Order XIX Rule 9 C.P.C.
6. As noticed in paragraph 2 above, the deponent of the aforesaid personal affidavit dated 25.2.2022 has not verified/sworn paragraphs either on personal knowledge or on the basis of information received from others or on the basis of information derived from the documents.
7. Affidavit is a mode of placing evidence before the Court. Party may prove a fact or facts by means of affidavi
Bharat Singh and Others v. State of Haryana
The main legal point established is the strict adherence to the rules governing affidavits, the prohibition of advocate's clerks signing affidavits, and the impact of non-compliance on the court's de....
An affidavit attested by a Notary Public is permissible for use in the High Court, and the court has the power to consider such affidavits in proceedings.
The main legal point established is that curable defects in an affidavit can be rectified, and the court has the power to allow amendment or strike out irrelevant matter in the affidavit to balance a....
Affidavits can serve as evidence in court provided sufficient reasons are shown for their admission.
The Court affirmed that new evidence must align with prior permitted pleadings to ensure fair trial rights.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.