ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Santosh Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the full legal document (wrapped in
JUDGMENT :
Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J.
This writ petition seeks to assail the First Information Report, dated 27.5.2022, registered as Case Crime No. 172 of 2022 (contained in annexure No. 1 to the writ petition), under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Sarai Inayat, District Prayagraj, on the ground that the FIR contains false accusations and that cognizance in the matter can only be taken only upon a complaint filed by the concerned Court, by virtue of Section 195 Cr.P.C., and in its absence the lodging of FIR is an abuse of the process of law.
2. In substance, the allegation in the impugned FIR is that a previous FIR, being Case Crime No. 553 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 120-B, 452 and 308 IPC, was lodged by the petitioners against the informant of the present case alleging commissioning of various offences, including an offence under Section 308 IPC. It is then alleged that in order to substantiate offence under Section 308 IPC a document in the form of a medical report has been fabricated by the petitioners during the course of investigation in Case Crime No. 553 of 2020, suggesting a fracture on the head of the informant/victim, which has been
Iqbal Singh Marwah and another v. Meenakshi Marwah and another
Kisan Trimbak Kothula v. State of Maharashtra
Lalita Jalan v. Bombay Gas Co.
M.S. Sheriff v. State of Madras
Murlidhar Meghraj Loya v. State of Maharasthra
State of Maharashtra v. Natwarlal Damodardas Soni
Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs to Government of West Bengal v. Abani Maity
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.