IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Rajesh Bindal, CJ., J.J. Munir, J.
Subodh Agarwal – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and others – Respondents
Writ Tax No. -1290 of 2022
Decided On : 25-01-2023
Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 148A (b), 148, 148(1) , 153A , 149 , 147 , 151, 153 , 90, 90A , 148B – Quashing of notice – Petitioner has approached Court praying for quashing of notice issued under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961, notice issued under Section 148 of Act and order passed by respondent rejecting objections raised by petitioner against issuance of notice under Section 148A(b) of Act – Further prayer has been made for dropping re-assessment proceedings initiated in pursuance of notice under Section 148(1) of Act – Held, Court may refer to some of decisions on point - In case of Group Corporation (supra), Court noticed that at one point Revenue had reopened assessment of assessee – However, such assessment failed on ground that reasons were not recorded by Assessing Officer for issuing such a notice – On same ground, Revenue issued fresh notice of reopening which was challenged before High Court - High Court held that when earlier order stood annulled on ground of lack of fulfillment of basic requirement under section 147 of Act, there was no bar against reopening assessment once again on same grounds after following due procedure in accordance with law – Present case cannot be said to be a case of change of opinion for reason that there is no finding recorded in earlier assessment order passed under Section 153A of Act, which was set aside on technical ground of non approval of competent authority in terms of Section 153D of Act - Court do not find any merit in present petition – Accordingly dismissed.
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has approached this Court praying for quashing of notice dated March 28, 2022 (Annexure-13) issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’), notice dated April 24, 2022 (Annexure-15) issued under Section 148 of the Act and order dated April 24, 2022 passed by respondent no. 2 rejecting the objections raised by the petitioner against issuance of notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. Further prayer has been made for dropping the re-assessment proceedings initiated in pursuance of notice under Section 148(1) of the Act.
2. Mr. Dhruva Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that search was carried out at the premises of the petitioner on August 31, 2015. A show cause notice was issued on June 1, 2016 under Section 153A of the Act for block assessment. The order of assessment was passed on December 31, 2017, which was challenged by the petitioner as well as the Department before the Income Tax Tribunal. The appeal filed by the petitioner was accepted whereas the one filed by the Department was dismissed. The order was further challenged by the Department by filing an appeal before this Court, which was dismissed vide order dated December 12, 2022.
3. After passing of the order under Section 153A of the Act, during pendency of the appeal against the aforesaid order, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on March 28, 2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Act, which was duly replied to by the petitioner. Rejecting the objection raised by the petitioner, order was passed on April 24, 2022 granting sanction for initiation of proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A(d) of the Act and consequently, a notice was also issued on April 24, 2022. Initiation of proceedings under Section 148 of the Act is subject matter of challenge in the present writ petition.
4. Referring to scheme of the Act, Mr. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel pointed out that special procedure has been prescribed in the Act for framing of assessment/re-assessment in cases of search and seizure. Chapter XIV-B was added. Subsequently, Section 153A was added with effect from June 1, 2003. Second proviso to Section 153A provides that any proceeding pending for assessment/re-assessment for the relevant period on the date of initiation of the search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A shall abate. In the case in hand also, after the assessment was framed under Section 153A, as a consequence of search, all pending proceedings abated. Section 149 of the Act was referred to, which provides for limitation for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act. As assessment of the petitioner had already been framed under Section 153A of the Act, which is comprehensive and framed, after taking approval from the higher authorities, the assessment for the same year cannot be reopened by issuing notice under Section 148 of the Act. In support of the arguments, reliance was placed upon judgments of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Ram Ballabh Gupta Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and others, (2005) 199 CTR and Gujarat High Court in Cargo Clearing Agency vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, (2008) 218 CTR.
5. As far as merits of the controversy and challenge to the order granting permission for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act are concerned, it was submitted that the grounds mentioned in the order granting approval for the show cause notice is nothing else but change of opinion. In support of the argument, reliance was placed upon judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd., (2010) 228 CTR (SC) 488 At the time of block assessment after search was carried out all the issues and the material available, were considered. In fact, the entire process started after an audit objection, to which reply wa
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers P. Ltd.
Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. v. ITO (1991) 191 ITR 662
ITO v. Selected Dalurband Coal Co. Pvt. Ltd. (1996) 217 ITR 597 (SC)
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 is invalid if based on materials already available during the original assessment, constituting a mere change of opinion without fresh evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of adhering to the procedure prescribed under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before initiating reassessment proceedings.....
Under section 147 of the Act the proceedings for the reassessment can be initiated only if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any....
Reassessment under Income Tax Act is impermissible on issues already addressed in a completed assessment, as it constitutes a change of opinion without new material evidence.
Mere change of opinion is not a ground for reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Point of Law : Court satisfied that there was prima facie material available on record before the assessing officer for issuing a notice for reassessment and the notice under Section 148.
The court established that the discretionary nature of inquiries under Section 148A does not mandate a personal hearing or exhaustive justification for the Assessing Officer's decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.