SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Jayant Banerji, JJ.
Suresh Kumar Tripathi – Petitioner
Versus
Election Commission of India And Others – Respondents
Writ - C No. 3159 of 2023
Decided On : 27-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Lokesh Kumar Dwivedi,Sr. Advocate
For the Respondent: Ashutosh Mishra

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Central forces – Ballot box – Claiming Election Commission – Writ petition has been filed praying for relief – Held, Learned counsel for respondent states that appropriate guidelines for conducting elections have been issued by respondent, which are to be followed by respondent – He also states that guidelines shall be followed by respondent – Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that guidelines issued by Election Commission shall be followed by respondent – Petition is disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Shailendra, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri Lokesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Amit Manohar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent no.3 and Shri Ashutosh Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2.

2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:-

    "I. To issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to install CCTV Cameras on each booth and to deploy Central forces like CRPF at the time of voting on 30.01.2023 at all booths and also for security of ballot box and on counting centre on 02.02.2023 at Jhansi and to appoint additional observer for conducting free and fair election in Allahabad-Jhansi Khand Sikshak Nirvachan 2023."

3. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 states that appropriate guidelines for conducting the elections have been issued by the respondent no.1, which are to be followed by respondent nos.2 and 3. He also states that the guidelines shall be followed by the respondent no.2.

4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that guidelines issued by the Election Commission shall be followed by respondent no.3.

5. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforenoted statement of the learned counsel for the respondents.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top