SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 223

KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL
Rajveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kamlesh Tripathi, Man Bahadur Singh, Noor Mohammad.

JUDGMENT :

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.

1. Heard Sri Man Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State.

2. Present two appeals were filed against the judgement and order dated 28.10.2017 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Court No.3, Bulandshahr in Sessions Trial No.271 of 2012 (State Vs. Rajveer Singh and another) by which both the appellants were awarded life imprisonment along with fine of Rs.20,000/- each, under Section-302 read with Section 34 IPC and in case of non-payment of fine they would further undergo two years incarceration. Appellants were also imposed six months imprisonment along with fine of Rs.10,000/- each under Section-201 IPC and in case of non-payment of fine, they would further undergo one year imprisonment.

Prosecution Case

3. As per the prosecution case, first informant Harbir Singh Arya Advocate (PW-1) had given a Tehrir dated 20.10.2011 to Station House Officer, Police Station-Narora, District-Bulandshahr stating therein that his son Lavkesh was married to Pooja, daughter of Rajveer resident of village-Kamalpur in the year 2009. Since, the date of marriage Smt. Pooja refused to live with his son Lavke

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top