JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2 and Mr. Rinku Verma, learned counsel for opposite parties 3 to 6.

2. Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 27.12.2019 passed in PLA Case No.15 of 2018 by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Lucknow whereby claim of private opposite parties for seeking compensation in terms of the Mukhya Mantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Bima Yojna has been allowed.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that aforesaid scheme of the State Government was floated in which various insurance companies were a party to the memorandum of understanding for the purposes of providing services for implementation of the said insurance scheme for indemnifying farmers of the State from accident and death arising therefrom.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that agreement was entered into between the petitioner-company and the State on 14.09.2016. It is further submitted that the said scheme was to be implemented with effect from the date it was entered into and as per provisions of the scheme, in case of death arising out of an accident pertaining to head of family/b