SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
Mujtaba Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Judicial Magistrate-Iii, Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for revisionist Sri Ghaus Beg, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. Learned counsel for revisionist submitted that he inadvertently impleaded Judicial Magistrate in the array of opposite party and learned counsel for revisionist submitted that he want to delete the opposite party no.1 Judicial Magistrate-III. Submission of learned counsel for revisionist is hereby allowed and it is directed to delete the same.
3. This Criminal Revision has been preferred u/s 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 against the impugned order dated 21.1.2023 passed by the Judicial Magistrate-III, Lucknow, whereby without assigning any cogent reason the learned trial court has rejected the application dated 24.1.2020. Being aggrieved with impugned order dated 24.1.2020 this revision preferred by the revisionist in respect of release of vehicle bearing registration no. UP-32/CN5543 (Bus).
4. Learned counsel for revisionist submitted that revisionist is the registered owner of vehicle no. UP-32/CN5543 (Bus). On 18.10.2019 the above mentioned vehicle met with an accident near Purniya Chaurah under P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow with motor cycle bearing regis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.