SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 503

PRITINKER DIWAKER, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Sudhir – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Hemendra Pratap Singh, Dinesh Kumar Mishra

JUDGMENT :

Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Since these appeals have been preferred against the same judgment and relate to same Crime Number, they were heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.

2. The Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Ghaziabad by the judgment and order dated 31.8.2012 passed in Sessions Trial No. 826 of 2011 (Crime No. 29 of 2011), P.S. Bahadurgarh, District Ghaziabad convicted and sentenced the appellants under Section 302 I.P.C. read with Section 34 IPC to undergo rigorous life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-each with stipulation of default clause. Aggrieved with the said judgment, present appeals have been preferred by the appellants.

3. Brief facts, as culled out from the record, are that a First Information Report was lodged by the informant, Giri Raj son of Sher Singh, resident of Palwara, Police Station Bahadurgarh, District Agra, on 22.10.2011 at 10.15 p.m., with the averments that his son Sompal was residing separately. Smt. Karishma, da

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top