IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ.
Lalji and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 532 of 1997
Decided On : 21-03-2023
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302/34 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Sections 207 and 313 - Rigorous imprisonment for life - Appellants guilty - Prosecution witnesses - Offence of Murder -
Whether there was delay in lodging F.I.R - Motive was absent - Absence of common intention to cause death of deceased - Held, Appellant was equipped with a blunt weapon - There was no previous enmity between parties - There was dispute relating to land which was being claimed by both of them - Deceased was heightening walls which was prevented by accused appellant and there was oral altercation on this issue - In course of oral altercation appellant assaulted deceased with on his head - Deceased tried to esacpe appellant again assaulted him but blows were made on hands not on head or chest - Show that there was no premeditation in mind of appellant to cause death of deceased or to cause such bodily injury which was likely to cause his death - Appeal Allowed.
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.
1. The present criminal appeal emanates from the judgment and order dated 26.02.1997 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mirzapur in Sessions Trial No. 77 of 1993 (State vs. Lalji and Others) arising out of Crime No. 196 of 1991 under Section 302/34 IPC, Police Station Chunar, District Mirzapur whereby accused Lalji, Shyamji, Pyare and Chhotai have been convicted and sentenced under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC with life imprisonment.
2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 26.10.1991 at about 4 p.m. Lalman, father of the informant was heightening the walls of the cow shed (Gaushala) on the land granted on lease with the informant, sister Savita, mason Chibilli and labour Sita. In the meantime, Lalji, Shyamji, Pyare and Chhotai equipped with lathies came there. While abusing they claimed the land belonging to them as their lease land. Lalman responded by saying that it was his lease land over which the old cow shed was constructed. At that Shyamji exhorted and all the accused persons started beating him with lathies. He ran for about 30-40 steps but the accused persons surrounded him and killed by beating with lathies. On hue and cry, Satyawan and Dhananjay came there and then the accused persons went away. The F.I.R. was lodged by the informant Shyam Bahadur on the same day at about 8.30 p.m. at the police Station Chunar as crime No. 370 of 1991, under Section 302 IPC. The detail of which was entered into G.D. Report No. 42.
3. The investigation of the case was handed over to S.I. V.P. Singh who proceeded to the place of occurrence and collected blood stained and plain soil from the spot and prepared the fard.
4. The inquest of deceased Lalman was conducted by S.I. V.P. Singh, inquest report was prepared in presence of witnesses, dead body was sealed, other essential papers were prepared and the dead body was handed over to constables Murtaza Ali and Chhangur Dubey for postmortem.
5. Dr. S.C. Srivastava conducted the autopsy on the dead body of Lalman on 27.10.1991 at 3 p.m. at District Hospital Mirzapur and prepared the postmortem report Exhibit Ka-2. Details of which are as under:
The dead body was brought in sealed cloth. Seal compared and found intact. The age of the deceased was about 60 years and time since death was about one day.
External Examination: Average built body. Rigor mortis passed off in upper extremities and was present in lower extremities. Blood clot was present in nostrils. Eyes were closed.
Ante-mortem injuries:
(1) Lacerated wound 3 cm x ½ cm x bone deep on right side of scalp, 8 cm above right external ear.
(2) Lacerated wound 8 cm x 2 cm x cranial cavity deep over right side of scalp posteriorly 5 cm above and posterior to right external ear. The underlying bone was fractured and brain matter was visible.
(3) Lacerated wound 2 cm x 1 cm x cranial cavity deep over posterior side of scalp on right side 2 cm below injury no. 2.
(4) Abrasion 4 cm x 1 cm over upper surface of right shoulder.
(5) Abrasion 2.5 cm x 1 cm over posterior surface of left elbow.
(6) Abrasion 2 cm x 2 cm over posterior medial surface of left arm 7 cm above left wrist.
(7) Abrasion 1 cm x 1 cm over posterior surface of left wrist.
Cause of death was mentioned as coma due to head injury.
6. After inspection of the place of occurrence, Investigating Officer prepared the site plan and recorded the statements of witnesses conversant to the facts of the case, thereafter concluded the investigation and found a case, prima facie made out under Section 302/34 IPC. After preparing the charge sheet, he submitted it to the court concerned.
7. The cognizance of the offence was taken by the court concerned and copies of prosecution papers were provided to accused persons in compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C. and the case was committed to the court of session for trial.
8. Learned trial court framed the charges under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC on the basis of material on record and after giving opportuni
Behari Prasad vs. State of Bihar
Brahm Swaroop and Another vs. State of U.P. (2011) 6 SCC 288
Dalip and Others vs. State of Punjab
Masalti vs. State of U.P. AIR 1965 SC 202
Pulicherla Nagaraju @ Nagaraja vs. State of A.P. (2006) 11 SCC 444
SupremeToday
Point of law : Motive plays an important role and becomes a compelling force to commit a crime and therefore motive behind the crime is a relevant factor for which evidence may be adduced.
The court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to manslaughter under Section 304 Part II IPC, emphasizing lack of premeditation and specific intent due to sudden provocation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, based on the circumstances and intentio....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Fourth Exception of Section 300 IPC, considering the absence of premeditation, sudden fight, and influence of intoxicatio....
Point of Law; It is well settled by plethora of judicial pronouncements by this Court that suspicion, however strong cannot take the place of proof. An accused is presumed to be innocent unless prove....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.