PRAKASH SINGH
Sandeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Shree Prakash Singh, J.)
1. Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Girijesh Dwivedi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
2. By means of the present application, prayer has been made to quash the impugned order dated 31.03.2023, passed by Additional Session Judge, court no. 4, Barabanki, Session Trial No. 273/2012, State of U.P. versus Rakesh, up to the extent of summoning of revisionist under section 319 of Criminal Procedure Code and to stay the operation and implementation of impugned order dated 31.03.2023, passed by the Kamal Kant Srivastava, Additional Session Judge, court no. 4, Barabanki, Session Trial No. 273/2012, State of U.P. versus Rakesh up to the extent of summoning of revisionist under section 319 of Criminal Procedure Code.
3. Since, pure legal question is involved in this matter, thus, notice to the opposite party no. 2 is hereby dispensed with.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the revisionist submits that initially the first information report was lodged against the present revisionist, including the other co-accused persons, wherein, after the investigation, the present revisionist wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.