Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAMEER JAIN
Ramnarayan Ram Daroga – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of fir and incident. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments concerning the trial court's summoning. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. opposing arguments supporting trial court's summoning. (Para 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 4. legal framework on section 319 cr.p.c. summoned. (Para 19 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. conclusion and outcome of the revision. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Byas Kumar Prasad, learned counsel for the revisionists, Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent and Sri Sukhendu Pal Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
Brief facts of the case:-
4. After registration of the FIR, investigation was conducted and during investigation involvement of the revisionists were found false and charge- sheet has not been filed against them but during trial, on the basis of the statements of P.W.-1 (opposite party no.2), P.W.-2 and P.W.-3, revisionists have been summoned by the trial court under Section 319 Cr.P.C . vide impugned order dated 30.10.2023. Hence, the instant revision.
5. Learned counsel for the revisionists submits that impugned order dated 30.10.2023 passed by the trial court is illegal as while summoning the revisionists under Section 319 Cr.P.C . trial cou
Criminal Procedure requires strong evidence for summoning additional accused; mere witness statements may not suffice, particularly in light of delays in FIR.
The trial court can summon additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. only if there is more than a mere prima facie case supported by evidence.
The court established that the power to summon additional accused under Section 319 of the CrPC is contingent upon the existence of prima facie evidence presented during the trial, and that the trial....
The power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is discretionary and should be exercised sparingly based on strong and cogent evidence, and the test for summoning a person is one which is more than prima facie c....
The trial court must find prima facie evidence to summon accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., not merely act on possibilities; significant discretion and evidentiary standards apply.
The court established that the invocation of Section 319 Cr.P.C. does not require a prior opportunity for the summoned person to be heard, provided there is sufficient evidence against them during th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
