MOHD. AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI
Arvind – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MOHD. AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI, J.
1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record.
2. This appeal has been filed by the accused appellant Arvind against the judgment and order dated 16.05.2019 passed by the Special Judge (Gangsters Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Muzaffarnagar in S.T. No. 87 of 2015 (State vs. Arvind and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 532 of 2014, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the “Gangsters Act”), Police Station Budhana, District Muzaffarnagar whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 3(1) Gangsters Act for ten years R.I. with fine of Rs.15,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he was ordered to serve five months additional imprisonment.
3. Aggrieved thus, by the impugned judgment and order dated 16.05.2019, the accused appellant Arvind preferred this appeal. It may be added that there were 05 accused and they were charge sheeted in trial court. The present appeal has b
Alister Anthony Pareira vs. State of Maharashtra
Deo Narain Mandal vs. State of U.P. (2004) 7 SCC 257
Guru Basavraj vs. State of Karnataka
Jameel vs. State of U.P. (2010) 12 SCC 532
Mohd. Giasuddin vs. State of A.P. AIR 1977 SC 1926
Ravada Sasikala vs. State of A.P. AIR 2017 SC 1166
State of Punjab vs. Bawa Singh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretion of the court in awarding the minimum sentence guided by the principles of proportionality and the importance of compliance with mand....
'Reformative theory of punishment' is to be adopted and for that reason, it is necessary to impose punishment keeping in view the 'doctrine of proportionality'.
in operating the sentencing system, law should adopt corrective machinery or deterrence based on factual matrix. Facts and given circumstances in each case, nature of crime, manner in which it was pl....
Criminal justice jurisprudence adopted in the country is not retributive but reformative and corrective. At the same time, undue harshness should also be avoided keeping in view the reformative appro....
Criminal justice jurisprudence adopted in the country is not retributive but reformative and corrective. At the same time, undue harshness should also be avoided keeping in view the reformative appro....
The judgement underscores the reformative approach to sentencing, emphasizing that punishment should balance deterrence with rehabilitation, and highlights the importance of corroborative evidence in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.