Back
PANKAJ BHATIA
Jagran Prakashan Limited – Appellant
Versus
Amar Kumar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. After hearing the matter, this Court had called for the records of Writ-C No. 23212 of 2021. As the issue raised in both the writ petitions is common, both the writ petitions are being decided by means of this common order. For the sake of brevity, Writ-C No. 10149 of 2023 is being decided as a leading case.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 11.10.2022, 07.11.2022 and 04.01.2023 whereby total of 57 references have been consolidated and decided.
3. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner is a newspaper establishment as defined under section 2(d) of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Condition of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (herein after referred to as 'WJ Act'). The petitioner is situated at Noida and is engaged in the business of printing of newspaper in the name and style of 'Dainik Jagran'. In addition to the said, the petitioner is also engaged in the news through electronic media and website etc.
4. It is claimed that the respondent no. 1 of Writ Petition No. 10419 of 2023 was appointed on the post of Dispatcher on probation basis w.e.f. 01.11.2007 with the petitioner. Simi
Section 17(2) Labour Court can determine incidental questions of category, cadre and nature of work while computing benefits due under notified wage board recommendations.
The Act 1955 constitutes a single scheme for the recovery of money due from an employer to an employee, and the notification specifying the officers competent to dispose of applications under Section....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the lack of power of delegation conferred on the State Government under Section 17(2) of the Act of 1955, rendering the References made by the Assi....
Claiming wages - It is proved to the satisfaction of the High Court or Supreme Court that such workman had been employed and had been receiving adequate remuneration during any such period or part th....
The court affirmed that the Labour Courts in Delhi have jurisdiction for disputes arising from the Majithia Wage Board recommendations based on combined cause of action and situs tests, emphasizing e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
