SUNEET KUMAR, RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Shivani Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Suneet Kumar, J.
1. Heard Shri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Mool Chandra Maurya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 4 and Shri Mukul Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the Staterespondent.
2. Petitioner claims to be daughter-in-law of the fourth respondent and sister-in-law of fifth respondent. Fifth respondent is the son of fourth respondent.
3. Petitioner, by the instant writ petition, is challenging the order dated 6 April 2023, passed by the second respondent-District Magistrate, District-Etah and the fact finding communication dated 29 March 2023, issued by the third respondent-Sub-Divisional Magistrate Etah, District- Etah.
4. By the order dated 6 April 2023, based on the fact finding communication dated 29 March 2023, submitted by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Etah, District-Etah, petitioner has been directed to be evicted from House-A Block, Lodhipuram, Peepal Adda, Etah, Thana-Kotwali Nagar, District-Etah. The order came to be passed on the directions of this Court in a Writ Petition No. 809 of 2023, dated 10 January 2023, filed by the fourth respondent.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has raised
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.