SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Prof. Amar Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Ms. Jigyasa Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Ms. Mamta, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Satyendra Kumar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 4 and Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief:-
b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, to command the Respondent no.2 to issue a fresh advertisement for the Posts Principal after considering the applied proper reservation policy accordingly in respect of the Advertisement No.D-1/E-1/2023 dated 02.02.2023 in respect of Uttar Pradesh Medical Department (Ayurvedic Department)/or decide the representation/letter of the petitioner dated 17.02.2023 (Annexure No.5 to the writ petition)."
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the cadre strength of the Principal, Government Ayurved
The ceiling limit for reservations in recruitment must not exceed 50%, and backlog vacancies should be managed according to established legal principles, ensuring equality of opportunity for all cand....
The court ruled that no reservation is necessary for super specialty posts, affirming that adherence to merit must prevail in such appointments.
Employment and Service matter - Posts of Junior Engineer (Civil) - SC and ST category - Promotion/resignation/retirement/Selection - It is true that Rule 5(2) of Reservation Rules of 2005 provides th....
Reservation in employment under Article 16(4) of the Constitution requires plurality of posts; a solitary post cannot be reserved, as it violates the constitutional bar against 100% reservation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.