JUDGMENT :

(Suresh Kumar Gupta, J.)

1. On 11.5.2023, following order was passed by this Court:

"1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This criminal revision U/s 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 has been against the order dated 31.7.2019 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act)/8th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bahraich in Criminal Appeal No. 08/2019, U/s 101 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Police Station-Dargah Sareef, District-Bahraich whereby the appeal filed by the respondent no.2 has been allowed and order dated 6.3.2019 passed by Juvenile Justice Board has been quashed in case no. 70/12/2018 vide case crime no. 48/2018, U/s 363,366,376,328,506,120B IPC and Section 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, Police Station-Dargah Sareef, District- Bahraich.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the revisionist conflict with law is juvenile. In this matter, the alleged date of mentioned in the FIR as 26.2.2018. The Juvenile Justice Board arrived at a conclusion that as per the educational certificate of Class V marks sheet, scholar register and transfer certificate