PRITINKER DIWAKER, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. Present criminal appeal has been preferred by appellants Amar Singh and Panjabi against the judgement and order dated 6.4.2012 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Kannauj in Sessions Trial No.181 of 2011 (State vs. Amar Singh and another) convicting the appellants for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 394 and 307 IPC and sentencing them to undergo rigorous life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/-and seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 4,000, respectively, with stipulation of default clause. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. Brief facts of the case, as culled out from the record, are that informant Mijaji Lal son of Ramadin Yadav, resident of village Mansukhpurwa, Majra Bahosi, Police Station Indergarh, District Farrukhabad gave a verbal information on 28.12.1989 at about 20.30 hours at Police Station Indergarh that on 28.12.1989, his brothers Mewa Lal and Prahlad and nephew Veer Singh had gone to sow wheat in
Anil Rai Vs. State of Bihar (2001) 7 SCC 318
Ashok Kumar Chaudhary v. State of Bihar
Bhagwan Jagannath Markad Vs. State of Maharastra
Bikau Pandey Vs. State of Bihar (2003) 12 SCC 616
C. Muniappan vs. State of T.N.
Deepak Verma Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2011) 10 SCC 129
Hari Kishan and State of Haryana vs. Sukhbir Singh
Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Sat Kumar vs. State of Haryana
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. S. Rayappa and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.