OM PRAKASH-VII, NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI
Brijesh Chaudhari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Om Prakash-VII, J.
1. Since these criminal appeals have been filed against the same judgment and order and have been heard together, therefore, the same are being decided by this judgment.
2. These criminal appeals have been preferred by the accused appellants against the judgment and order dated 04.04.2011 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bijnor in Session Trial No. 174 of 2003 (State vs. Brijesh Chaudhari and others), arising out of case crime no. 186 of 2003, convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC to undergo life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, for the offence punishable under Section 201 IPC to undergo three years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000/-each with default stipulation, for the offence punishable under Section 394 IPC to undergo seven years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10000/- each with default stipulation and for the offence under Section 411 IPC to undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
3. The facts of the case, as unfolded by the informant / applicant Dr. Jagwant Singh son of Balwant Singh, re
Nar Singh Versus State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh alias Pamma v. State of Uttarakhand
Basava R. Patil & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Avtar Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab
Wasim Khan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Bhoor Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab
Santosh Kumar Singh v. State through CBI
State of Punjab v. Hari Singh & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.