YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Paltoo Ram Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri S.B. Singh, along with Sri Hemant Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kunal Ravi Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel along with Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and also Sri Vinod Kumar Chandel, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
2. The present petition seeks to raise an issue with regard to availability of the statutory remedy of a revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against an order of remand passed in an appeal.
3. The admitted facts between the parties are that land bearing plot no. 89 measuring an area of 0.150 hectares situate at Village Harakhpur, Pargana and Tehsil Sagri, District Azamgarh was jointly held by two real brothers namely Rajdeo and Hardeo having equal share. One half of the undivided share of the aforestated plot was purchased by the respondent no.6 and the predecessor-in-interest of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 by means of a registered sale deed dated 20.05.2003 executed by one of the coowners namely, Hardeo. The remaining half of the share was purchased by the petitioner on 01.10.2004 through a registered sale de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.