JUDGMENT :

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Dwijendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs:

“(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 29.4.2023 passed by Additional Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra in Revision No. 81 of 2012-13 (Computerized Case No. C2013100000274), under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act and order dated 18.01.2013 passed by Assistant Collector First Class/Revenue Officer Mainpuri in Case No. 95 of 2009-10 under Section 229B of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act (Ramvir Singh vs. Vinod and Others).

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to disturb the right, title and possession of the petitioner over the land in dispute well described in the writ petition, except following the dues required procedure in accordance with law.

(iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondent authorities commanding them to keep intact the entries in the relevant statutory records as it is toda