Back
ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL
Sushila Devi – Appellant
Versus
Priyanka, Upziladhikari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the supplementary affidavit.
2. The present contempt application has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 03.12.2020 passed by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.20344 of 2020.
3. It is contended that applicant had filed aforesaid writ, which was disposed of vide order dated 03.12.2020. Copy of the said order was served to the opposite party on 07.01.2021, but the said direction has not been complied with by the opposite party till date.
4. Prima facie, a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.
5. However, no notice is issued to the opposite party at this stage. The opposite party is granted three months' further time to comply with the order dated 03.12.2020 passed by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.20344 of 2020 from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
6. The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite party and another self-addres
The court has the authority to address cases of willful disobedience of court orders and can grant further time for compliance before taking further action.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
