SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1320

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, PRASHANT KUMAR, JJ.
Pooja Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondent
Writ C No. 26406 of 2023
Decided on : 06-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vishal Pandey, Ashvanee Kumar Srivastav
For the Respondent: Paras Nath Rai

The judgment establishes the court's authority to invoke the parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint a guardian for a person in a comatose state in the absence of specific legislative provisions.

Headnote:

Guardianship - Comatose State - The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - The judgment discusses the appointment of a guardian for a person in a comatose state and the legal framework surrounding it. It highlights the absence of specific provisions for appointing a guardian for such individuals under existing legislation and the invocation of the parens patriae jurisdiction by the court to address the situation. The judgment also references various previous court decisions on similar matters and lays down guidelines for appointing a guardian for a person in a comatose state.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, wife of a person in a comatose state, sought permission to sell her husband's property for his medical treatment. The court examined the medical condition of the husband and the absence of legislation allowing the appointment of a guardian for a person in a comatose state.

Finding of the Court:

The court invoked the parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint the petitioner as the guardian of her comatose husband, allowing her to make decisions regarding his medical treatment and manage his assets. The court also directed the sale of the husband's property for the husband's welfare and the family's financial support.

Issues: The absence of specific provisions for appointing a guardian for a person in a comatose state under existing legislation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court invoked the parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint a guardian for the comatose person and laid down guidelines for the guardian's responsibilities and the sale of the person's property.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petitioner to sell her husband's property, appointed her as the guardian of her comatose husband, and provided guidelines for the management of the husband's assets and the use of the sale proceeds for medical expenses.

JUDGMENT :

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.

1. Heard Shri Anupam Kulshreshtha, learned Amicus Curaie assisted by Shri Ashvanee Kumar Srivastav, learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri S.P. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General of India assisted by Shri Paras Nath Rai, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

    "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authority to permit the petitioner to sell the property of her husband for the treatment of her husband namely Vikas Sharma, who is suffering from head injury.

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to provide the Government help for the treatment of the husband of the petitioner.

III. Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.

IV. To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner."

3. The husband of the petitioner has purchased a piece of land through a registered sale deed dated 5.9.2011. After purchasing the land, his name has also been mutated in the revenue records. Unfortunately, the petitioner’s husband, who had bought the land, met with an accident and sustained serious head injury. He is lying in a camatose state since then. The petitioner, who comes from a very average family, has been subjected to lot of medical expenses, which she is unable to pay. She has already incurred huge expenses in connection with the treatment. Having exhausted all financial resources, she is in despair, isolation and abandonment besides undergoing agony, stress on account of her husband lying in “permanent vegetative state”.

4. The petitioner (Pooja Sharma), being the wife of Vikas Sharma, has come forward with the aforesaid prayer. She has approached this Court by means of instant petition seeking permission to sell the property purchased by her husband from his own income, to meet out the expenses of treatment of her husband. The petitioner submits that in India there is no legislation, which provides for appointment of Guardian for a person in camatose state, unlike legislations for appointment of ‘Guardian for minors’ and persons with other disabilities like mental retardation etc.

5. When the matter came up before this Court on 20.9.2023, this Court was pleased to pass the following orders:-

    "1. Heard Shri Anupam Kulshreshtha, learned Amicus Curaie assisted by Shri Ashvanee Kumar Srivastav appearing for the petitioner; Shri S.P. Singh, learned Addl. Solicitor General of India assisted by Shri Paras Nath Rai, learned counsel for Union of India and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel along with Shri F.A. Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. Present writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to permit the petitioner to sell the property of her husband namely Vikas Sharma, situated at Gautam Budh Nagar, for his treatment, who is in critical medical condition due to head injury. It is further prayed for a direction to respondents to provide the government help for treatment of her husband.

3. It appears that the husband of the petitioner had purchased the land in question through registered sale deed and his name has also been mutated in the revenue record. Unfortunately, the husband of the petitioner met with an accident and sustained serious head injuries and, therefore, he is lying in Comatose State since then. The petitioner comes from very humble family and has been subjected to lot of medical expenses, which she is unable to pay at present. She has already incurred huge expenses in co



                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top