CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Prafull Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Chandra Kumar Rai, J.)
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ojha, Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Gyanendra Pratap Singh for respondent no.4 and Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
3. Brief facts of the case are that one Gajraj Singh was the recorded tenure holder of the plot in dispute. Gajraj Singh has alleged to execute a registered will deed on 23.12.1992 in favour of Usha Singh. On 9.1.1993., Gajraj Singh has alleged to execute another unregistered will deed on 9.1.1993 in favour of his nephew-Digvijay Singh and others. Tehsildar initially allowed the mutation in favour of Vijay Bahadur and others vide order dated 15.7.1993 but later on the order for mutation dated 15.7.1993 was recalled and fresh order was passed on 12.11.2018 in favour of Usha Singh on the basis of registered will deed executed on 23.12.1992. The order of Tehsildar was maintained in revision by Revisional Court while dismissing the revision filed by petitioner vide impugned order dated 21.11.2022 hence this writ petition for quashing the order dated 12.11.2018 and 21.11.2022 in the proceeding u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.